[freeside] initial config saves some of the values?

[ivan at 420.am]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:47:55PM -0400, Randall Lucas wrote:
> Ivan,
> 
> Cool.  I think it would really jumpstart the process of 
> user-contributed documentation; when the time is right, perhaps it 
> could be edited into a more "formal" document.
> 
> I agree that the MixedCaps style isn't best for a later-to-be-published 
> document; happily, there are Wikis that can be configured differently.  
> I'll check into a few Wiki packages and recommend one or two for you to 
> choose from.

Okay, the Wiki software you recommended is installed and working.  Once
you get a basic skeleton up, I'll put it on the homepage.

-- 
_ivan


> 
> Best,
> 
> Randall
> 
> On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 01:30 PM, ivan at 420.am wrote:
> 
> >Well, if you think getting some sort of collaberative FAQ/Wiki-type 
> >site
> >is important at the moment, then go ahead and make it happen... :)
> >
> >Personally, I'm not too fond of the InterCapWikiStyle that removes
> >the spaces in every title, and would prefer a collaberative FAQ manager
> >that didn't do that, but since I wouldn't be the one making it happen 
> >at
> >the moment, my preference means very little.
> >
> >I'd be happy to host it, of course.
> >
> >-- 
> >_ivan
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 12:30:35PM -0400, Randall Lucas wrote:
> >>
> >>Ivan et al.,
> >>
> >>An awful lot of exchanges have gone like this on this mailing list:
> >>
> >>1> Question which has already been addressed or which is not directly
> >>related to Freeside.
> >>2> Answer noting that the question has already been addressed and/or 
> >>is
> >>not part of FS.
> >>1> Request that such a thing be added to docs / FAQ.
> >>2> Curt reply that person 1 should write such docs / FAQ himself.
> >>1> [no action, person 1 drops off face of earth]
> >>
> >>For better or for worse, asking one individual to write things up 
> >>seems
> >>to scare off 99% of people.  Since that doesn't get us any closer to
> >>having a strong documentation set, perhaps we could lower the barrier
> >>to entry by putting a Wiki or such up, upon which an FAQ and a
> >>User-contributed documentation project could be started.  That way, 
> >>the
> >>reply in the exchange above could be:
> >>
> >>2> Reply that person 1 add this particular issue to the FAQ; see
> >>sisd.com/freeside/wiki/faq.
> >>
> >>Postgres already uses a Wiki on their Techdocs site, with some success
> >>(of course, their FAQs and manuals have "official" maintainers, but
> >>they are a huge project).
> >>
> >>My personal server is going to be moved around in the next couple
> >>months so it's not a good place to host one right now, but if sisd.com
> >>doesn't want a Wiki up, perhaps I could get my company to host.
> >>
> >>Thoughts?
> >>
> >>Best,
> >>
> >>Randall
> >>
> >>On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 02:28 AM, ivan at 420.am wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:10:18AM -0400, Tony Carter wrote:
> >>>>According to this
> >>>>http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/
> >>>>help.html#Wrong_Apache_mod_perl_co
> >>>>mbination Apache 2.x is not compatible with mod_perl 1.
> >>>>
> >>>>What is everyone else on the list using?
> >>>>
> >>>>Ivan, can you please publish a "supported versions" matrix of some
> >>>>sort?
> >>>
> >>>If you think a "supported versions" document is important, then you
> >>>should put it together and submit it.
> >>>
> >>>I belive I've stated only about a billion times on the list that 
> >>>Apache
> >>>2 is *NOT SUPPORTED* until mod_perl 2 comes out.  The mod_perl 1.99
> >>>pre-releases don't count.
> >>>
> >>>My customers who run Red Hat all use 7.3.
> >>>
> >>>-- 
> >>>_ivan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>-Tony
> >>>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: Randall Lucas [mailto:rlucas at tercent.net]
> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:56 AM
> >>>>To: Tony Carter
> >>>>Cc: ivan-freeside at sisd.com
> >>>>Subject: Re: [freeside] initial config saves some of the values?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Hmm, is it too early to call this a trend?  Damn Red Hat for 
> >>>>shipping
> >>>>with that glorified beta software.
> >>>>
> >>>>I am testing a second installation with Apache / mod_perl 1 and
> >>>>haven't
> >>>>experienced this problem (although httpd will crash before even
> >>>>logging
> >>>>or segfaulting if I try to PerlRequire either Apache::ASP or
> >>>>HTML::Mason -- however, it seems to work fine without 
> >>>>PerlRequire'ing
> >>>>ASP at startup).
> >>>>
> >>>>Best,
> >>>>
> >>>>Randall
> >>>>
> >>>>On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 12:51 AM, Tony Carter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>*The major note to this is I am using mod_perl 1.99 / Apache 2 on
> >>>>>>this
> >>>>>>testing box.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Of the others who've had conf script troubles, what is your os/fs
> >>>>>>version/apache version/mod_perl version?  Can you check to see
> >>>>>>what's
> >>>>>>coming through on the request?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Best,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Randall
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Randall,
> >>>>>I'm using Redhat 9.0, ext3 fs, Apache 2.40 with mod_perl-1.99_07.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-Tony
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>-- 
> >>>_ivan
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >-- 
> >_ivan
> >
> 

-- 
_ivan